What is Just War Theory?
Kenneth Samples August 21st, 2007
Through the centuries Christian thinkers have taken different positions on the controversial subject of war. Three broad theories concerning the morality of war for the Christian can be identified: activism, pacifism, and selectivism. Activism asserts that it is virtually always right to participate in war. Strict pacifism insists that it is never morally right to partake in war. Selectivism argues that it is sometimes right to take part in war.
Just war theory is a type of selectivism contending that while war is always tragic and often evil, it is sometimes morally right, just, and practically necessary. Some leading Christian advocates of just war theory have included Augustine of Hippo (354-430), Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), and Francisco Suarez (1548-1617). Just war theory involves two main moral categories of evaluation.
1. Jus ad bellum (Justness of War)
Concerning the moral justness of waging war, a just war must conform to the following moral considerations:
A Just War will
"-Be waged by a legitimate authority (government or state, not private individuals)
"-Reflect moral deliberation (last resort after sincere diplomacy)
"-Have probability of success (reasonable belief that victory can be achieved)
"-Have a just cause (e.g., defense of innocents and freedom against direct aggression)
"-Be just in intent (establish peace, freedom, justice; not unlimited destruction of the enemy)
2. Jus in bello (Justice in war)
Concerning the conduct of war, strategy and tactics must be just:
A Just War will be conducted
"-With proper proportionality (sufficient, but not excessive force will be used; good should outweigh evil)
"-With proper discrimination (noncombatants [civilians or innocents] should not be targeted)
Just war theory has been criticized for various reasons through the years (e.g., by failing to appreciate the benefits of a preemptive strike, being unrealistic in its moral expectations, being practically unworkable), yet it nevertheless remains the most commonly accepted position among Christian thinkers when it comes to evaluating the moral considerations of waging war.
For further study on the ethics of war, see John Jefferson Davis, Evangelical Ethics, 3rd ed. (P&R Publishing, 2004) and J. P. Moreland and Norman L. Geisler, The Life and Death Debate (Praeger, 1990).
Kenneth Samples is vice president for theological and philosophical apologetics at Reasons to Believe and author of Without a Doubt: Answering the 20 Toughest Faith Questions. Mr. Samples will be a guest on SBE on 8/31.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 21st, 2007 at 6:59 am and is filed under Christianity, Theology, War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.










WordVixen
Just for the record for any folks just discovering...
Confessions of a Reformission Rev. – Mark Driscoll
Laura O'Neill
Thanks for doing this interview, Steve. I so agree...
The Resignation of Eve – Jim Henderson on SBE
renée altson
S. – I understand that kind of paralysis. Your word might be entirely different. spend...
Embrace
Lisa
I love this, Renee! I pick a word as well, and was surprised by my word this year, too. And yet,...
Embrace
S. Davidson
And here is the substance of the matter for me in my life, too: “It’s just that I’m afraid...
Embrace
Mark
…”but at home at night their fat and...
The Resignation of Eve – Jim Henderson on SBE
Manuel
Great show! I loved the new version of...
Fathers, Sons, Porn & Grace – Nate Larkin on SBE
Greg Neu
This is in reply to Jonathan...
Jesus + Nothing = Everything – Tullian Tchividjian on SBE (Re-Air)
Duane Zimmerman
Are you crazy??? The only...
Jesus + Nothing = Everything – Tullian Tchividjian on SBE (Re-Air)
Jonathan Kennedy
Totally enjoyed listening...
Jesus + Nothing = Everything – Tullian Tchividjian on SBE (Re-Air)