Steve's on

Description

What Would MLK Do?

Susan Isaacs January 19th, 2011

MLKThis week our nation honored the life of Martin Luther King Jr., a Christian activist who led the civil rights movement using nonviolent means. He was assassinated for it. And though the civil rights movement continued, and though I believe that history is teleological, lately it doesn't seem to be moving toward a happy place. It's been a dark chapter in our history, as these last few weeks have highlighted.

The economy is in the toilet. Our culture has become increasingly hostile toward religion (and sometimes with good reason. Take Fred Phelps, whose church protests high-profile funerals with "God hates F-gs" posters. Sick.). Masses of dead birds fall from the sky, leagues of fish wash up on our shores, and some noted prophetess blames it on the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Her line of reasoning reads like a Monthy Python sketch. Well, she's partly right. All that dead wildlife is a sign from the Almighty: it's God's retribution for PajamaJeans.

Some psychopath guns down six people at a political gathering, including a girl who was born on September 11, 2001. She was only 9 and was already interested in civic life. I imagine her parents told her every year on her birthday, "You are a miracle born out of despair. Someday you can make a difference." And now she's gone like MLK. FoxNews tried to paint the insane shooter as a leftist; the Left tried to blame it on Sarah Palin. Of course neither side is directly responsible. But to deny that all this public venom has NO effect on us, is like saying that internet porn has no effect on intimacy, or violent video games on youth. Or that sex doesn't lead to dancing.

A few measured commentators agreed, we need to take it down a notch. Well one man tried to do something about it. Back in 2009 Mark DeMoss, a Republican and prominent evangelical Christian, was alarmed at the increasingly vicious tone in American politics. He founded The Civility Project. He wrote a pledge, sent 585 letters to every governor and sitting member of congress, and asked them to sign it. The Pledge was simple:

  • I will be civil in my public discourse and behavior.
  • I will be respectful of others whether or not I agree with them.
  • I will stand against incivility when I see it.

He received only three signatures. Three out of our 585 elected officials agreed to abide by the pledge. Last week DeMoss pulled the plug on the project.

So much for the politicians. What about the pundits? Just once I'd love one of them to listen to his opponent and reply, "I don't agree but I respect your opinion." Or go really crazy with, "That's a good point. I'm going to think about that for a while, and maybe it will change how I look at the issue."

Which political personality is going to be the first to dial it down: Keith Olberman? Glenn Beck? Not as long as they keep getting great ratings. Why do they have great ratings? Because we watch them. Why do we watch them? Well, maybe they scratch that sinful itch to point the finger at someone else. "It was Eve; she gave me the apple."

When I say "we," I'm referring to our society as a whole. But we Christians are part of our society, so some of us must be contributing to those ratings. We are not putting the hateful words in their mouths, but we are encouraging them to say those things by patronizing their shows.

Do words not matter as much as actions? Jesus said in Matthew 5? "You have heard that our ancestors were told, 'You must not murder. If you commit murder, you are subject to judgment.' But I say if you are even angry with someone you are subject to judgment! If you call someone an idiot, you are in danger of being brought before the court. And if you curse someone, you are in danger of the fires of hell."

Are we taking Jesus seriously? I don't propose we disengage from public life. In What's So Amazing About Grace Philip Yancey wrote:

"Politics draws lines between people; in contrast, Jesus' love cuts across those lines and dispenses grace. That does not mean, of course, that Christians should not involve themselves in politics. It simply means that as we do so, we must not let the rules of power displace the command to love."

On Martin Luther King Day you may not have gone to a rally or a prayer vigil or a love-in, but you can do something. Practice nonviolence by choosing what you say and read and watch and hear. Turn off the TV haters and read the Sermon on the Mount. Listen to worship music rather than a radio pundit. Pray for your opponents and ask God to give you a picture of how he sees them.

And please, for the love of all that is good and precious in this world, do not buy PajamaJeans.

Buy one of Cathleen Falsani's T-Shirts instead.

Susan Isaacs is a writer, actor, and comedienne with TV and film credits including Planes Trains & Automobiles, Scrooged, Seinfeld, The Drew Carey Show, My Name Is Earl and more. She is an alumnus of The Groundlings Sunday Company and the author of Angry Conversations With God: A Snarky But Authentic Spiritual Memoir.

Click here to listen to Susan's most recent appearance on SBE.

Print This Post | Email This Post

This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 19th, 2011 at 2:33 pm and is filed under , , , , , , , , , , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “What Would MLK Do?”

Obed January 21st, 2011

I had to Google PajamaJeans. Yeesh, that's pretty horrifying. Not so much the product itself, but the ads!

At any rate, I spend a lot of time on the road in my line of work. At one time I listened to part of Glenn Beck's show because it filled a slot and he was funny. But as his popularity rose, the humor waned and the political heat rose. And I found myself getting angry at "them." I realized I had to turn it off. I don't like being angry, especially at my fellow citizens just because some fool on the radio knows how to push the right buttons.

Erik Guzman January 21st, 2011

Yup. Gotta watch them fools on the radio ; )

Susan January 21st, 2011

Yes, Beck CAN be funny. And he can be measured, too. He had my friend Eric Metaxas on Fox o talk about Metaxas' book "Bonhoeffer" and I thought Beck did a great job. I think it was Bill O'Reilly who first referred to his extremist colleagues and opponents as "performers." I'm not sure if they're playing a role or they're "true believers." The problem is that their fans are true believers. When it stirs up acrimony, disrespect and even hatred, then it becomes destructive.

Mark Graham January 25th, 2011

I hear so little that refutes his content (on facts – interesting and little-known facts – married with a drive to see the problem as corruption rather than political.) And speaking to values that contrast those of the elite and commonwealth. The conclusion of his that there are no political answers to the problems we face today.

What I do hear is fear and hatred of a man. That's about it – and I have really searched. I just don't know about that stuff – you can eat up all the hate you want and it will never fill the emptiness.

But on 'style' – I have to agree with so many that he can come across as arrogant, sarcastic, sometimes mabe even mean-spirited (spawned by his wn fears maybe). Those human failures he braodcasts to millions – which I guess is foolish or crazy, maybe some boldness and freedom in the mix.

There are folks that take issue with this administration (his focus) for reasons of fear themselves. And the fear of losing what (don't call me Francis) Schaeffer mentioned are the two wost of evils – personal peace and affluence. They see hope in Becks opposition to their 'enemy'. But they are just attacking corruption with corruption…whic is a sad situation. Certainly this administration and congress speaks to the better values of social justice – but in the way the man Job did not sin with his 'lips.'

I must admit – even if I didn't enjoy the conent on Glenn Beck, and often his delivery of it – I would still DVR it. Bacause so many people hate him. I'm vindictive that way.

Mark Graham January 26th, 2011

Was thinking on the (sometimes ironic) power of negative words. Once the 'Tea Party' was a random grassroots semi-collective of grievances. So many different demands that it was hard for them to come together or even grow in voice. Then the airwaves were literally polluted with the term 'Tea-Baggers'. From pundits and politicians alike. Like water to the sapling. This water caused an historic shift in congress. Which was contrary to the interests of those who promoted the negative words. – just an observation.

Leave a Reply

Comments

Aimee Fournier

Blew my mind at every turn of the page made me weep made me...

Three Free Sins – Steve Brown on SBE


Jeremy Myers

Steve Taylor is my favorite theologian. Yes, I...

The Blue Like Jazz Movie – Steve Taylor on SBE


davidjames

I think John should have...

Who Is That Man? In Search of the Real Bob Dylan: An Interview with David Dalton


Bernie / dago cleo from facebook

as much as I like having the...

The Blue Like Jazz Movie – Steve Taylor on SBE


Cara Brown

What a great read, if you want to get real. Thank you Steve for...

Three Free Sins – Steve Brown on SBE


davidjames

WOW….”Blue Like Jazz”….I...

The Blue Like Jazz Movie – Steve Taylor on SBE


Marcos

Steve Taylor is a genius, and a Francis Schaeffer...

The Blue Like Jazz Movie – Steve Taylor on SBE


Zach

Well said, Shawn.

God’s Not Mad at You – Steve Brown & Susan Isaacs on SBE


Joseph

Hey Steve, to here you teach about this is for a me a drink of cold...

Three Free Sins – Steve Brown on SBE


Dee

Agree with Elizabeth!!!

Why Some Christians Still Love Conspiracy Theories