<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the Hitler Parallels Too Close for Comfort?</title>
	<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/</link>
	<description>This blog needs a description!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-14466</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-14466</guid>
		<description>Presidential directives have always been controversial and wild.  

Anyone remember the nutty ones Bill signed back in the '90's?

In the end, I don't think they have much teeth, which is why there are so many of them and they are notoriously nutty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidential directives have always been controversial and wild.  </p>
<p>Anyone remember the nutty ones Bill signed back in the &#039;90&#039;s?</p>
<p>In the end, I don&#039;t think they have much teeth, which is why there are so many of them and they are notoriously nutty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-12514</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-12514</guid>
		<description>This is a bit on the paranoid side, no doubt. At the beginning of 2009, Bush will return to his ranch in Crawford and the next president (pray to God that's it's not Hillary) will take over.

We have courts and Congress as a checks and balances system. We're not likely to go quietly into the night of a dictatorship. After Nixon, the executive branch lost power for obvious reasons. Under Bush, as a result of 9/11, the executive branch has regained some power. These things ebb and flow.

Even with the extended powers, there are people with integrity in place who would use these carefully.

Hillary has been up to her neck in lies and scandals, which has been the case since Bill was gov in Arkansas. She regularly lies. While she's an "ends justify the means" sort of person, not even she could get away with dictatorship.

It was worse in WW II. We put Japanese Americans in camps. The govt read people's mail. After the war, things went back to normal.

Keep bringing people to Christ and helping people and don't lose sleep over this.

Perspective people. Keep an objective one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit on the paranoid side, no doubt. At the beginning of 2009, Bush will return to his ranch in Crawford and the next president (pray to God that&#039;s it&#039;s not Hillary) will take over.</p>
<p>We have courts and Congress as a checks and balances system. We&#039;re not likely to go quietly into the night of a dictatorship. After Nixon, the executive branch lost power for obvious reasons. Under Bush, as a result of 9/11, the executive branch has regained some power. These things ebb and flow.</p>
<p>Even with the extended powers, there are people with integrity in place who would use these carefully.</p>
<p>Hillary has been up to her neck in lies and scandals, which has been the case since Bill was gov in Arkansas. She regularly lies. While she&#039;s an &#034;ends justify the means&#034; sort of person, not even she could get away with dictatorship.</p>
<p>It was worse in WW II. We put Japanese Americans in camps. The govt read people&#039;s mail. After the war, things went back to normal.</p>
<p>Keep bringing people to Christ and helping people and don&#039;t lose sleep over this.</p>
<p>Perspective people. Keep an objective one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>As a historian teaching in college, I have seen this coming for some time.  We clearly are at the "Julius Caesar moment" in our nation's history when a "good person" does a "bad thing" for the sake of the nation's "greater good."

Note, this is NOT a Republican or Democrat, a "hate Bush" or "hate Clinton" thing.  This is an issue related to what we understand about our Republic.  Note, the author above mentions "to do away with our democracy" thus revealing what he does NOT seem to know, that our founders INTENTIONALLY did not form us as a Democracy, but rather a Republic with democratic (small "d") principles.

The real tragedy is that we've been lulled to sleep with our success, having no more real challenges to us as a nation since the 1950s.  Thus we've raised 3 generations who have had to pay no price, seen no real wanting, and have been babysat by an all-powerful government (Thank you, Mr. FDR).  If any of the founders came around today,  they would be horrified that we allowed an all-powerful Central Government to be able to tax our income, take away our property, threaten to take away our right to free speech and the many other issues.

The danger is not just that we have our own "Enabling Act" but that, as is always true in a Democracy, we can be so easily bought.  As long as we still get our handouts as old people, as (supposedly poor people), as people in disasters and a ton of myriad other ways, we'll sit fat, dumb and happy.

As the Italians supposedly said after Mussolini assumed power (also legally through elections), "at least the trains run on time."  All Bush or the next President has to do is promise to give all us "poor people" $25,000 annually or some other kick-back (could be free college, free health care, free cars, free gas, or cheaper versions of the same), most people will never look up from the Xbox or TVs to even notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a historian teaching in college, I have seen this coming for some time.  We clearly are at the &#034;Julius Caesar moment&#034; in our nation&#039;s history when a &#034;good person&#034; does a &#034;bad thing&#034; for the sake of the nation&#039;s &#034;greater good.&#034;</p>
<p>Note, this is NOT a Republican or Democrat, a &#034;hate Bush&#034; or &#034;hate Clinton&#034; thing.  This is an issue related to what we understand about our Republic.  Note, the author above mentions &#034;to do away with our democracy&#034; thus revealing what he does NOT seem to know, that our founders INTENTIONALLY did not form us as a Democracy, but rather a Republic with democratic (small &#034;d&#034;) principles.</p>
<p>The real tragedy is that we&#039;ve been lulled to sleep with our success, having no more real challenges to us as a nation since the 1950s.  Thus we&#039;ve raised 3 generations who have had to pay no price, seen no real wanting, and have been babysat by an all-powerful government (Thank you, Mr. FDR).  If any of the founders came around today,  they would be horrified that we allowed an all-powerful Central Government to be able to tax our income, take away our property, threaten to take away our right to free speech and the many other issues.</p>
<p>The danger is not just that we have our own &#034;Enabling Act&#034; but that, as is always true in a Democracy, we can be so easily bought.  As long as we still get our handouts as old people, as (supposedly poor people), as people in disasters and a ton of myriad other ways, we&#039;ll sit fat, dumb and happy.</p>
<p>As the Italians supposedly said after Mussolini assumed power (also legally through elections), &#034;at least the trains run on time.&#034;  All Bush or the next President has to do is promise to give all us &#034;poor people&#034; $25,000 annually or some other kick-back (could be free college, free health care, free cars, free gas, or cheaper versions of the same), most people will never look up from the Xbox or TVs to even notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>I'd actually trust Clinton or Obama with that type of power more than Bush.  They would be too scared to make a "bad" decision, and I think Bush has already demonstrated that he's not at all scared to make a bad decision - in fact,at times he seems all to eager to make bad decisions.

Not that making a bad decision is so terrible.  I'm just concerned that Bush doesn't seem willing to correct his mis-steps.  It's not weakness to admit an error and change course, but it is very stupid to know that changes need to be made and yet to not make them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d actually trust Clinton or Obama with that type of power more than Bush.  They would be too scared to make a &#034;bad&#034; decision, and I think Bush has already demonstrated that he&#039;s not at all scared to make a bad decision - in fact,at times he seems all to eager to make bad decisions.</p>
<p>Not that making a bad decision is so terrible.  I&#039;m just concerned that Bush doesn&#039;t seem willing to correct his mis-steps.  It&#039;s not weakness to admit an error and change course, but it is very stupid to know that changes need to be made and yet to not make them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Hopefully those bills/laws/decrees expire when he leaves office and won't apply to the next president.  Could you imagine the mess we would be in if Hillary or Obama got ahold of that kind of power.  That is scary, it makes me feel that much more at peace that we have someone like George calling the shots, at least for now.  I fear life in this country after the next election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully those bills/laws/decrees expire when he leaves office and won&#039;t apply to the next president.  Could you imagine the mess we would be in if Hillary or Obama got ahold of that kind of power.  That is scary, it makes me feel that much more at peace that we have someone like George calling the shots, at least for now.  I fear life in this country after the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/blogs/the-guest-room/are-the-hitler-parallels-too-close-for-comfort/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>That is truly horrifying. I would never have thought Bush capable of something so seemingly nefarious but I was wrong. Why in the world is this not being paid more attention to? Particulalry since the most media is in opposition to Bush. He's always been portrayed as a buffoon who can barely handle the demands of feeding himself let alone running the country but this would indicate otherwise. He clearly has more street smarts than we thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is truly horrifying. I would never have thought Bush capable of something so seemingly nefarious but I was wrong. Why in the world is this not being paid more attention to? Particulalry since the most media is in opposition to Bush. He&#039;s always been portrayed as a buffoon who can barely handle the demands of feeding himself let alone running the country but this would indicate otherwise. He clearly has more street smarts than we thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
