We have a number of regular guests on the talk show. When they're not talking, many of them are writing. This is where you'll find their stuff.

The views expressed by our guest bloggers do not necessarily reflect the views of sane, moral and/or reasonably intelligent people. Jesus may or may not be pleased (or even care). And what's more, they certainly don't reflect the views of Steve Brown (I'm not even sure he knows any of this is going on).

Blog DescriptionThe Guest Room

Florida Bar Governors - Guardians of Democracy or Guards of a Gulag?

Jack Thompson July 16th, 2007

In 1976, having graduated from Vanderbilt Law School, I came to Miami and became a Christian and then a lawyer, in that order. I have tried to keep those two roles in that particular order.

In 1989 I secured the first fines ever levied by the Federal Communications Commission for airing indecent material in violation of 18 USC 1464. The radio station's attorneys retaliated by collaborating with the former chairman of the Florida ACLU to persuade The Florida Bar to go to the state Supreme Court, which required me to submit to psychiatric and psychological tests to determine if "Jack Thompson's obsession against pornography is so severe that he is mentally incapacitated by that obsession and thus unfit to practice law."

The Bar's own shrinks examined me and found that "Jack Thompson is a Christian acting out his faith." I am now the only officially Bar-certified sane lawyer in Florida. The Bar's insurer paid me damages for the honor"“but now The Bar is pursuing me again.

Meantime, I was amicus curiae in the 1990 federal trial that found Miami rap group 2 Live Crew's album As Nasty As They Wanna Be was "obscene" under Miller v. California's three-prong test.

In 1992, with Charlton Heston, I persuaded Time Warner, largest communications company in the world, to pull rapper Ice-T's "Cop Killer" from store shelves worldwide. The ACLU then declared me one of its "Censors of the Year," a false sobriquet I wear as badge of honor. Ice-T has gone from advocating the killing of police officers to portraying one on NBC's Law and Order: SVU. The irony is sweet vindication of what I have spent two decades doing.

In 2004 I got the Howard Stern Show canceled by all Clear Channel Communications radio stations when I sent the FCC and Clear Channel, a transcript of this comment aired by shockjock Stern: "Ever bang any famous nigger chicks? What do they smell like? Watermelons?"

Clear Channel was fined $495,000 for airing indecent material because of my formal FCC complaint, the basis for which is the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in FCC v. Pacifica which establishes the constitutionality of Congress' laws that prohibit indecent material on the public airwaves between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when minors are likely to be in the audience in significant numbers.

So, I have used laws that have been held constitutional to try to protect children from adult entertainment. Has this made me an "unethical" lawyer? The Florida Bar thinks so.

In 2005 I was interviewed on CBS' 60 Minutes, by Ed Bradley about my wrongful death lawsuit in Alabama on behalf of the families of three cops shot and killed by a teen who had trained on Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, a cop-killing murder-simulation video game.

Reader's Digest, the world's widest-read publication, produced an original report that favorably treated the case, one buttressed by testimony from four experts who also have testified before Congress on the violent video game copycatting phenomenon.

Remember Jeffrey Wigand after he appeared on 60 Minutes to blow the whistle on predatory tobacco-industry marketing and selling an adult product to minors? Big Tobacco launched a "shoot the messenger" strategy to try to destroy him. It didn't work (see why in the movie The Insider, starring Al Pacino.)

Similarly, the giant video-game maker of Grand Theft Auto, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., hired the Philadelphia law firm of Blank Rome, with offices in Florida, to do to me what Big Tobacco did to Wigand after my appearance on 60 Minutes. Blank Rome, by the way, is not only Take-Two's registered lobbyist in both the U.S. House and Senate, but is the largest "bundler" of campaign cash to Bush-Cheney in both 2000 and 2004. (Don't you love a "family values" administration that takes money from the lobbyist for the company that embedded the "Hot Coffee" porn mod in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and sold it to children?)

Blank Rome's task for porn-to-kids client Take-Two was to gin up baseless SLAPP (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation) Florida Bar complaints to stigmatize, exhaust, and intimidate me. I have had to file a federal civil rights lawsuit to prove the illegality of these SLAPP complaints in which The Florida Bar has enthusiastically participated with Blank Rome, violating its own procedural rules in doing so. This is "payback" for my success against The Bar's similar collaboration with the shock-radio industry years ago.

The Florida Bar has subverted its solemn charge from the Florida Supreme Court to protect the public from unethical lawyers. It is now the politically correct, left-wing thought police and has chosen a side in "the culture war" to gut the public-spirited effort to enforce constitutional laws that protect kids from adult-rated material. The American Psychological Association has found these products modify behavior and constitute a health and safety hazard to our society.

The Florida Bar a few years ago conducted a poll to see what we lawyers thought of The Bar's disciplinary machinery. A disturbingly high number of us responded by stating that "who you are and whom you know" can determine what discipline is pursued and meted out.

My attorney and I met in Tallahassee May 15, 2006, at the offices of Greenberg Traurig's Barry Richards with Bar general counsel Paul Hill, executive director John Harkness, then Bar president Alan Bookman, and president-elect and now president Hank Coxe. Mr. Coxe looked at me and said, "You need to be suspended from the practice of law because of the vitriol with which you have addressed these entertainment industry lawyers." Excuse me, Hank. I've sat with families whose loved ones are dead because of these products. "Vitriol" is the least that shameless lawyers deserve, especially when they file, in violation of federal criminal civil-rights laws, SLAPP Bar complaints. Coxe is the guy who rather vitriolically and publicly went after the Bush Administration for keeping terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay. One man's vitriol is another man's altruism, it seems. Just ask Hank.

There is more proof Coxe and his "Guardians of Democracy" (how Bar Governors described themselves in a brochure) have become thought police. After that May 15 Tallahassee sit-down, Bar prosecutor Sheila Tuma demanded, in writing no less, on behalf of The Florida Bar, that I submit to a battery of psych tests again by The Bar to determine once more whether my successful activism is pathological.

Thus, the thoroughly recidivist Florida Bar has adopted the Stalinist techniques of the Soviet gulag. The Bar seeks to pathologize my Christian faith and public activism because my agenda is not theirs. More than shocking, this is a criminal violation of the right to engage in First Amendment-protected speech and acts, as codified in federal civil rights laws.

"An appeaser," said Churchill, "is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." If The Bar can get away with this illegal hijacking of our disciplinary system at my expense and while you look on, then you may be next.

That's why I have filed a civil rights suit against The Florida Bar that may cost its membership millions of dollars. This lawsuit will ask the jury for tens of millions of dollars so that even Hank Coxe will understand that such Bar nonsense must end.

If you want to know more about what The Florida Bar is doing in the above regards, or if you have your own horror story, please contact me, Jack Thompson, at 305-666-4366 (office), 305-588-3005 (cell), or e-mail amendmentone@comcast.net

You can read Jack Thompson's fully researched and corroborated book about what The Florida Bar tried to do to him the last time it lost its mind. Published by Tyndale House, it is entitled Out of Harm's Way.

Print This Post | Email This Post | Digg This!

This entry was posted on Monday, July 16th, 2007 at 9:28 am and is filed under , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Florida Bar Governors - Guardians of Democracy or Guards of a Gulag?”

Jack Thompson July 19th, 2007

Steve, thanks for posting this! All of it is true, but here's a new twist that has occurred since: The Bar's "desginated reviewer" who guarantees the "fairness" of all this has received a "target letter" from the US Dept. of Justice alleging he has laundered money for the Medellin cocaine cartel. These are the people sitting in judgment of me? I'm working on my next book, with a tip of the cap to Willie Nelson. Here's the title: Mamas, Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be Lawyers. ;) Peace, Jack

Ryan Cook July 21st, 2007

Well said, Mr. Thompson, well said indeed. Your post was informative and presented yourself in a favorable light, while showing the Florida Bar to be demons in their own right.

Unfortunately, I have to take issue with some of the things you stated as "truth," particularly in the second half of your post. I'm not very familiar with your work against the radio and music industry; however, I am well aware of your work against violent video games and the reputation you have gained as a result of that work.

First of all, I agree with your notion that GTA: Vice City can be regarded as a "cop-killer", since the player is able to kill police officers during the course of the game (it should be noted, however, that it is not mandatory for players to kill police officers in order to finish the game), but I disagree with your stance that it is a "murder-simulation video game." I say this, because your terminology seems to imply that the goal of the game is to kill as many people as possible, to feel some sort of violent high, or that the entire game is targeted towards killing people. This is not the case. It is possible to beat the game without killing anyone, though it is difficult to do so.

Second, I take issue with your attempt to paint yourself as the innocent victim of high-profile, big-name companies like Take-Two, when you are, in fact, innocent of nothing. You have repeatedly claimed that video games have been the cause of, or involved in, a number of lawsuits where police have found no evidence of video game abuse (though you were correct in some), you have authored or co-authored numerous video game censorship laws that were later found to be unconstitutional and did not take effect, and repeatedly used insults and pejorative language to describe your critics and virtually anyone associated with video game promotion. Indeed, you have even been asked by the National Institute on Media and Family to stop using their name in your campaigns, with NIMF President David Walsh saying "Your commentary has included extreme hyperbole and your tactics have included personally attacking individuals for whom I have a great deal of respect."

Along with this, your description of Take-Two as "the company that embedded the "Hot Coffee" porn mod in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and sold it to children" is grossly misleading and severely tainted with your own biases. With regards to the "Hot Coffee" mod, you fail to emphasize that it was just that: a mod. The content itself was NOT viewable during normal game play, only being accessible through an individual's conscience decision to change the properties of the game (actions not disclosed by the publisher or creator) to allow the scene, as well as purposefully fulfill the requirements for the scene to be unlocked. In conjunction, the fact that such content was even considered to be in a game defeats your argument that the game was sold to children, as if Take-Two is on some crusade to infect us with degenerative morals. The company sells the game to distributors who then are responsible for selling it to anyone they wish. In any case, the "Hot Coffee" mod would not have been available to children unless it was unlocked for them by their parents or someone with the computer skills to apply the mod and then the know-how to access it.

With regards to the Florida Bar itself, you said that "The Bar seeks to pathologize my Christian faith and public activism because my agenda is not theirs" and that "The Florida Bar has subverted its solemn charge from the Florida Supreme Court to protect the public from unethical lawyers." This is also misleading and fails to mention the terms of many of the Bar's actions against you, specifically that the Bar has filed disbarment proceedings against you because of professional misconduct, including making defamatory statements about numerous judges, disobeying a gag order made by Judge James Moore, along with "separate grievances filed by people claiming that Thompson made false statements and attempted to humiliate, embarrass, harass or intimidate them."

I could go on for a while, mentioning incidents such as the whole Bully fiasco and your "Modest Video Game Proposal", but I think this post is long enough already. I will say that I do agree with your belief that certain video games should not be sold to minors, but I do not believe that harassment, frivolous lawsuits, and unconstitutional laws are the way to go about it. Instead, I think it is more import for parents to be educated about game rating systems such as the ESRB ratings and become more involved in their lives of their children than they currently are, so that there is no reason for such laws to be even considered.

Thanks for your time.

Leave a Reply