We have a number of regular guests on the talk show. When they're not talking, many of them are writing. This is where you'll find their stuff.

The views expressed by our guest bloggers do not necessarily reflect the views of sane, moral and/or reasonably intelligent people. Jesus may or may not be pleased (or even care). And what's more, they certainly don't reflect the views of Steve Brown (I'm not even sure he knows any of this is going on).

Blog DescriptionThe Guest Room

This is the End…of Evangelicalism, My Friend

Michael Spencer January 28th, 2008

jim-morrison.jpg***Music by The Doors: “The End.”***

There was an elf that met the children at the door. Also in this room was a store that had Barbies, action figures, Brats Dolls, and all of the most popular items that you would find in a Toy-R-Us catalog the day after Thanksgiving. In order for kids to get the merchandise, they had to say a memory verse and earn store credits. The first thing my kids said to me when I went to pick them up was ”Daddy, can we start going to this church?” Can you blame them? For kids, this was a dream church.

If you listened to the interview I just did on Steve Brown, Etc., you may recall a moment when Steve and Erik asked me what was wrong with evangelicalism, and I said it was over. Steve gave a more hopeful view and I admitted that there were some hopeful signs out there, well off the media radar and among ordinary people.

Well Steve, it was a moment of weakness. You were being nice and I fell under your influence. But then I read C. Michael Patton’s post “The Entertainment Driven Church,” and I realized I was right: Evangelicalism is over. Long live post-evangelicalism. (Whatever we are/it is.)

This is “the end” of evangelicalism, and it’s not dying with a whimper. Oh no. It’s going out with party hats and noise-makers. And Bratz dolls. And Barbie. And video games. And an elf. And the Word-faith message. And Starbucks.

The end of evangelicalism isn’t the deep vacuum of space. It’s the Borg ship. With pizza, a band and great commercials.

Is this Christianity? If you realize your answer no longer has any basis in reality, consider just being honest: No, it’s not.

Are the living dead in a George Romero movie “people?”

Given the choice between any gnostic cult, Buddhism, atheism or what this church is doing, which do you pick as closer to Christianity? Pray about it and get back to me on that one. You wouldn’t like my answer.

You see, it’s actually much worse than even Michael admits. Patton’s kids have already been infected with the virus. They’re all going to start blinking like Osteen. The pastor of this carnival? He’s already got his sermons in book form, with a picture of him looking very indy-spiritual-sexy on the inside cover. And he’s on the program of ten “pastor’s” conferences somewhere, so he can tell what “God” is doing at their “church.” How many people believe he’s the voice of God? How many want to be him?

Make no mistake about it. This operation isn’t connected to the rest of Christian history or teaching the doctrines of the faith because they LOATH THEM. They’re boring. They’re old. They want nothing to do with them. Aside from borrowing the five letters “Jesus” as the brand image for their message of “here’s how to get what you want in life,” and using Biblical texts to make bizarre points about your own power to create that wonderful salvation called “success in life,” there’s far more connection to Starbucks than to the one, holy, Catholic and apostolic church.

It might even be better if the kids stayed with the elf, because here’s Michael’s summary of the exposition for the day.

Mark 7:33 Jesus took him aside from the crowd, by himself, and put His fingers into his ears, and after spitting, He touched his tongue with the saliva;

“Jesus took him aside”=Jesus wants to deal with us each individually

“Jesus spit”=Jesus had to form the saliva in his mouth before He spit, therefore, we are to let Him form our words.

“[He] put His fingers into his ears…He touched his tongue…and his ears were opened and his speech impediment was removed” (v. 35)=sometimes we don’t hear people rightly because we already have the wrong words in our mouth. Therefore, we have to have the right words in our mouth.

Michael finds a couple of nice things to say about the overall outcome of this talk, which proves that living near Tulsa is not a good thing. Run, Michael. Run.

And what is the response of the traditional Anglican church Michael visited? I really wish I knew. Do they understand that in some ways they are increasingly one of a very few outposts that are trying to hold onto the treasure that these megachurches are throwing out labeled “trash?” Do they understand how many people are going to wake up in that game show and say either “Is this it?” or “There is no God. I’m done.”? When they do- as thousands one day will- what then?

I wonder if that Anglican congregation has any idea that someone like Michael- who has been through amazing, terrible things in his life- might just be looking at all of this as more than an observer. He might be looking for where, in the worst of the darkness and the storm, will Jesus be found in community, Word, sacrament and worship?

This isn’t about kickin’ worship bands or big screens. Take them, take them. I don’t care. What I want to know is if we recognize that the disease is overtaking the evangelical body, and the time has come to think like people upon whom an evangelical dark age has come? The barbarians aren’t at the gates. They are running the city. We can’t shut the gates. We have to find places to survive. We can debate how big the hole in the side of the ship is all we want. The fact is: this ship is going down.

Christ’s church will survive and triumph. But in America and the West, the entertainment driven “church” is going to dominate. For those who will not be absorbed, for whom resistance is not futile, there are choices to be made.

Yes Michael, it was entertaining. But be afraid. Be very afraid.

The bus to Rome is leaving now, and it seems that every seat is filled. Oh…what’s that? Seems that a much larger bus to Atheism is pulling into the lot, and there are plenty of seats available.

***Music slowly fades out…..”This is the end…..”***

This piece was originally posted at InternetMonk.com. Go there often for regular posts and podcasts from Michael Spencer (a.k.a. The Internet Monk).

Michael has been blogging since 2000. He has a master's degree in Theology, is currently a campus minister living in a Christian community in southeastern Kentucky, and has been a teacher in churches and schools for more than 30 years.

Print This Post | Email This Post | Digg This!

This entry was posted on Monday, January 28th, 2008 at 3:03 pm and is filed under , , , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “This is the End…of Evangelicalism, My Friend”

Christov January 29th, 2008

What this is about is the same high view of clergy/ordination and correspondingly low view of laity that's resulted in the current state of church-as-usual and a corresponding desire among many to "do church" differently, or, to be cool about "church different."

Essentially you've got one guy with the requisite alphabet soup and club membership saying, "My model of clergy-led laity-passive church is traceable to the early reformers equals true orthopraxy and is therefore 'treasure,' whereas the model touted and led by a new generation of 'seeker-sensitive' personality and feelings driven cultist gurus is clearly something other than 'church.'"

Do we only have three choices - Rome, Atheism, or The Brick Shoebox (even if you actually live in the shoebox?)?

Obed January 30th, 2008

This reminds me of some stuff I've dealt with recently. After leaving a church I had been at for over a decade, I started church shopping. I had a pretty similar mental response to the big non-denominational Evangelical places I visited. They were nice. They were entertaining. But I wish they hadn't called the event 'church.' It was more like going to a concert and lecture than going to a worship service.

Like Patton, I find myself drawn toward an expression of the faith that is more rooted in the ancient heritage of Church. Philosophically, I jive with Anglicanism, but here in the States, the Episcopal Church really has some stuff they need to sort out. Lately, I've been attending Mass at a Roman Catholic place, 'cuz it's where my girlfriend goes. But I've got some serious theological issues with the Roman folks.

I guess sometimes the ecclesiastical landscape seems really bleak to me.

Christov does bring out a really interesting point, however: a lot of the more traditional churches are content to have a very passive laity. This is a bad, bad thing. However, what's the practial difference between a laity that's passive due to an over-emphasis on the clergy and a laity that's involved but ignorant to the Word/Truth due to weaksauce on the part of a 'seeker sensitive' environment and message?

Christov January 30th, 2008

I guess what I was saying is that both "models" are led by a religious professional up on stage in front of a largely passive audience that may be allowed to participate by singing, waving their hands, making ecstatic utterances, and so forth. The difference being the guys in astrodomes have abandoned theology and doctrine in favor of group hyperventilation that results in a tingly feeling that gets mistakenly attributed to the work of the Holy Spirit. High view of clergy/calling, low view of "sheep"/congregation.

Charles February 1st, 2008

I don't read a three-rail option list in his blog.

Look at Imago Dei and compare that with Life Church. Imago Dei is clergy led but the congregation is active as all get out. The church continues to bring the Kingdom into the city of Portland in creative ways that edifies the Body and makes me wish I had thought of it a long time ago. Life Church has XBOX stations in the youth rooms, barrista bars in the lobby and masses of people soaking up the disco balls, flashing lights and stage center. The actual sermon seems fine, but the entire worship is a show and the idea is to entertain the senses as the priority….and then everybody goes home or out to dinner, just like the brick shoe box models.

Both churches have abandoned the brick shoe box model. The idea that the brick shoe box has no relevance is very true. It's the spiritual motivation behind any church, rather than the outward appearances or models.

I am concerned about the same things. But I am also excited about new ways of worship and church that I believe are awesome and long needed.

Leave a Reply

Most Popular Stuff

Comments

MikeMcK

That would be Romans 7:19

Church ‘R’ Us (Part 2)

Read More

shelly

I was about to post what estuardo said. “What about...

Etcetera - 05.13.08 - Dis-Orientation

Read More

tommy

Didn’t Paul say something to the effect that the good...

Church ‘R’ Us (Part 2)

Read More

G-rock

http://youtube.com/watch?v=EXv i9bySjQQ

Etcetera - 05.14.08 - The Shack, Etc.

Read More

Ray

No, no relation. Michael has MUCH better hair.

Etcetera - 05.14.08 - The Shack, Etc.

Read More