<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Evangelical Manifesto - Guinness &#038; Smith on SBE</title>
	<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/</link>
	<description>This blog needs a description!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brown Etc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Etcetera - 07.22.08 - Priming the Pump</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-48030</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brown Etc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Etcetera - 07.22.08 - Priming the Pump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-48030</guid>
		<description>[...] Marvin Olasky, Os Guinness and Tony Campolo on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marvin Olasky, Os Guinness and Tony Campolo on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody&#8217;s an Evangelical at Oklahombres</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-47368</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody&#8217;s an Evangelical at Oklahombres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-47368</guid>
		<description>[...] at Steve Brown etc. Os Guinness and Warren Smith were having a &#8220;civil&#8221; debate over An Evangelical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] at Steve Brown etc. Os Guinness and Warren Smith were having a &#034;civil&#034; debate over An Evangelical [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evangelical Manifesto Revisited &#171; Grace &#38; Peace</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-47023</link>
		<dc:creator>Evangelical Manifesto Revisited &#171; Grace &#38; Peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-47023</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Brown, etc. - An interview with Os Guiness, who engages in a friendly debate with another guest - Warren Smith - who is critical of the Manifesto. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Brown, etc. - An interview with Os Guiness, who engages in a friendly debate with another guest - Warren Smith - who is critical of the Manifesto. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-46336</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevebrownetc.com/podcasts/steve-brown-etc/an-evangelical-manifesto-guinness-smith-on-sbe/#comment-46336</guid>
		<description>Excellent idea that is very much needed...but why so heavily - if not exclusively - reformed (Calvinist) theologians?  One of the problems with modern evangelicalism is its segmentation.  Why not come together with a manifesto that includes ideas across the evangelical/theological perspective?  There are outstanding Wesleyan evangelicals, Roman Catholic evangelicals, etc. From a practical standpoint, by not including those voices, the manifesto's reach becomes limited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent idea that is very much needed&#8230;but why so heavily - if not exclusively - reformed (Calvinist) theologians?  One of the problems with modern evangelicalism is its segmentation.  Why not come together with a manifesto that includes ideas across the evangelical/theological perspective?  There are outstanding Wesleyan evangelicals, Roman Catholic evangelicals, etc. From a practical standpoint, by not including those voices, the manifesto&#039;s reach becomes limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
